Stephen Henderson talked about developing the use of AI in the promotion of criminal justice.
Lauryn Gouldin discussed a concept entitled “specific suspicion” addressing whether police have to list a particular offense in seeking a warrant. She also presented a topic involving when the Fourth Amendment was triggered with the use of handcuffs and the nature of its continuous use.
Russell Gold addressed the impact of fiscally constraining law-making with a focus on trying to get legislatures to recognize the costs when making changes to statutes.
Eric Hintz talked about problems regarding habeas petitions focusing on the procedural requirements insofar as they fail to serve the goals of criminal justice and correcting errors.
Brittany Deitch presented about Pay To Stay Laws requiring inmates to reimburse for their cost of incarceration and how to reform this approach.
Brian Gallini discussed the George Floyd incident involving officer discretion and conduct prior to the actual homicidal act as the true area for reform. He also discussed the possibility of adding materials to his casebook regarding Bryan Kohberger and the implications of the DNA searches that led to his capture.
Melanie Reid talked about community policing noting that there was no cohesion with criminal justice.
Mike Vitiello addressed the inadequacy of the remedy for Fourth Amendment violations with a notion that it may be best to fashion a remedy based on property interests.
Brian Owsley discussed developing a Fourth Amendment property-centric approach for electronic surveillance.
Nicholas Kahn Fogel discussed an article addressing the implications of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Barnes v. Felix.
